Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Bild_Andreas_Norrman

Andreas Norrman

Professor

Bild_Andreas_Norrman

SCM PRINCIPLES VS. LEGAL PRINCIPLES: CHALLENGES AND FRICTION

Författare

  • Oskar Henkow
  • Andreas Norrman

Redaktör

  • Jan Stentoft Arlbjørn

Summary, in English

<b>Purpose of this paper:</b>

Logisticians propose changes to improve supply chains, and legal practitioners are doing likewise, but from a tax perspective. Proposals from one domain increasingly have an impact on the other due to e.g. globalisation – but cross-disciplinary knowledge often seems small. Our purpose is to facilitate interaction between the domains by increasing joint understanding of principles used in each domain, and to inquire into potential frictions and challenges.<br>



<b>Design/methodology/approach:</b>

Management principles for efficient logistics/SCM and key principles governing the legal systems are first summarized both on a paradigmatic and action level. Illustrations from practice are presented. These have been obtained by a cross-functional team interviewing both logisticians and lawyers. Findings are based on cross-functional comparative analysis of principles and illustrations.<br>



<b>Findings:</b>

Frictions between operational principles from each domain were found, with some principles harder to reconcile than others. There are also challenges between the two paradigms of logistics and law that influence the operational principles.<br>



<b>Research limitations/implications (if applicable:</b>

Some implications are that the knowledge gap, challenges and frictions between the professions and domains, both in practice and academia, would benefit from more research. Examples are given of laws that contradict current logistics principles.<br>



<b>Practical implications (if applicable):</b>

Although trivial, logisticians and lawyers need to cooperate better. We show on a fundamental level, with practical examples, kinds of challenges and frictions occurring.<br>



<b>What is original/value of paper?:</b>

The cross-functional approach with law, and the discussion/comparison of principles.

Avdelning/ar

  • Institutionen för handelsrätt
  • Teknisk logistik

Publiceringsår

2010

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

581-596

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

The 22nd Annual NOFOMA Conference

Dokumenttyp

Konferensbidrag

Förlag

Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship Management, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding

Ämne

  • Transport Systems and Logistics
  • Law

Nyckelord

  • Fiscal principles
  • Logistics principles
  • Supply chain principles
  • Taxation
  • Business law

Conference name

22nd Annual NOFOMA Conference, 2010

Conference date

2010-06-10 - 2010-06-10

Conference place

Kolding, Denmark

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISBN: 978-87-92471-05-5