Henrik Tehler
Professor
How Can We Make Disaster Management Evaluations More Useful? An Empirical Study of Dutch Exercise Evaluations
Författare
Summary, in English
The evaluation of simulated disasters (for example, exercises) and real responses are important activities. However, little attention has been paid to how reports documenting such events should be written. A key issue is how to make them as useful as possible to professionals working in disaster risk management. Here, we focus on three aspects of a written evaluation: how the object of the evaluation is described, how the analysis is described, and how the conclusions are described. This empirical experiment, based on real evaluation documents, asked 84 Dutch mayors and crisis management professionals to evaluate the perceived usefulness of the three aspects noted above. The results showed that how evaluations are written does matter. Specifically, the usefulness of an evaluation intended for learning purposes is improved when its analysis and conclusions are clearer. In contrast, evaluations used for accountability purposes are only improved by the clarity of the conclusion. These findings have implications for the way disaster management evaluations should be documented.
Avdelning/ar
- Avdelningen för Riskhantering och Samhällssäkerhet
- Lund University Centre for Risk Assessment and Management (LUCRAM)
Publiceringsår
2020-10
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
578-591
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Volym
11
Issue
5
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Springer
Ämne
- Other Civil Engineering
Nyckelord
- Disaster management evaluation
- Evaluation design
- Evaluation report
- Exercise evaluation
- The Netherlands
- Usefulness
Aktiv
Published
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 2095-0055